To the editor,
Musk’s petition language mirrors recent attacks by Musk and Trump on federal judges who have ruled against the administration. It reads:
"Judges should interpret laws …
This item is available in full to subscribers.
To continue reading, you will need to either log in, using the login form, below, or purchase a new subscription.
If you are a current print subscriber, you can set up a free website account and connect your subscription to it by clicking here.
Otherwise, click here to view your options for subscribing.
Please log in to continue |
To the editor,
Musk’s petition language mirrors recent attacks by Musk and Trump on federal judges who have ruled against the administration. It reads:
"Judges should interpret laws as written, not rewrite them to fit their personal or political agendas. By signing below, I'm rejecting the actions of activist judges who impose their own views and demanding a judiciary that respects its role — interpreting, not legislating."
Opposing Petition Rewrite
“Trump and Musk should interpret laws as written, not rewrite them to fit their personal political agendas. By signing below, I’m rejecting the actions of corrupt leaders who impose their own views and demanding a leader that respects its role - following , not undermining the
Constitution.”
Resist, please sign and donate your $100 to Crawford for WI Supreme Court election.
Tom Garfin
River Falls
