To the editor,
The letter published in last week’s paper suggesting Sheriff Koranda wants “absolute authority” over Flock cameras is a serious mischaracterization of what the Sheriff …
This item is available in full to subscribers.
To continue reading, you will need to either log in, using the login form, below, or purchase a new subscription.
If you are a current print subscriber, you can set up a free website account and connect your subscription to it by clicking here.
Otherwise, click here to view your options for subscribing.
Please log in to continue |
To the editor,
The letter published in last week’s paper suggesting Sheriff Koranda wants “absolute authority” over Flock cameras is a serious mischaracterization of what the Sheriff said.
His comments were about the responsibility that comes with controlling sensitive law-enforcement information. He was expressing concern about who has access to that information and the importance of making sure the technology is used properly and responsibly.
In fact, Sheriff Koranda has also expressed a desire for an oversight group that includes members of the public and people who are not law-enforcement professionals to provide additional accountability.
That hardly sounds like someone seeking unchecked power. It sounds like someone who understands the responsibility that comes with the office.
Ruth Gredvig
Prescott
