To the editor,
Kudos to the Oak Grove Town Board for recently hosting a well-balanced forum on Operations Ordinances for CAFO’s (Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations).
Oak …
This item is available in full to subscribers.
To continue reading, you will need to either log in, using the login form, below, or purchase a new subscription.
If you are a current print subscriber, you can set up a free website account and connect your subscription to it by clicking here.
Otherwise, click here to view your options for subscribing.
Please log in to continue |
To the editor,
Kudos to the Oak Grove Town Board for recently hosting a well-balanced forum on Operations Ordinances for CAFO’s (Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations).
Oak Grove’s Town Hall was packed. The panel included:
Throughout the evening the audience was told that CAFOs are the most regulated sector of Wisconsin’s ag industry. However, Rod Webb’s concise answers to several audience questions painted a different picture:
1) Audience Question: Within the CAFO permitting process, is there a requirement for systematic testing of the well water within the neighboring community?
Webb’s reply: “No.”
2) Audience Question: Within the CAFO permitting process, is there a requirement that industrial-sized ag operations monitor the air quality of the neighboring community?
Webb’s reply: “No.”
3) Audience Question: Within the CAFO permitting process, is there a requirement that industrial-sized operations have a surety bond so that local taxpayers aren’t on the hook to clean up the site in case the operation fails?
Webb’s reply: “No.”
Webb’s one-word answers help explain why townships such as Maiden Rock where I live, are passing Operations Ordinances to address gaps in county and state CAFO regulations that threaten our communities’ health and property.
Mary Anne Wise
Chair, Maiden Rock Township’s Operations Ordinance Study Commission